After the 2020 elections, many major tech platforms faced intense scrutiny on censorship issues. Because of this spotlight on many social media platforms, there is increased pressure to counter. This countering revolved around legislative efforts to moderate the problem. There is a call for anti-trust focus upon the tech platforms.
Control Over Digital Speech
In the wake of the 2020 U.S. presidential election, social media platforms exercised significant control over speech. Twitter banned political ads in 2019, while Facebook and Google imposed temporary restrictions on political ads after the election. That has since changed regarding Twitter.
Trump is a major example of the power of the tech platforms. After the January 6th episode about the attacks upon Congress, the president was removed from the Twitter platform. His many statements about election fraud caused the owner of Twitter to have Trump removed. Once the company was purchased by Elon Musk, a change occurred in the platform towards free speech. But not without attacks upon the new owner by the left.
Sign our petition to support the Constitution!
Also earn $47 for every person you refer to sign the petition if they’re in a swing state.
Goal is to get 1M voters in swing states to show support for free speech & right to bear arms. https://t.co/2cjdY7pnj9
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 6, 2024
Legislative Push and Free Speech Concerns
Concerns over this power have led to congressional actions, spearheaded by Congressman Adam Schiff and other Democrats, to enhance misinformation policing. Critics from conservative media argue this jeopardizes First Amendment rights, cautioning against potential government overreach in content moderation. This sentiment echoes past controversies where censorship patterns were reported.
If Facebook owner Mark Zuckerberg is to be believed, the change is necessary. That counters his past issues with complaints of censorship by Facebook. ” We made a lot of decisions that affected people’s ability to speak” He stated.
Economic ties between social media’s power and political influence necessitate discussions of reform in antitrust laws, focusing beyond just economic impacts. The suggested amending of the Clayton and Sherman Acts and updates to Section 230 of the Communications Act form the basis of this proposed reform.
Content Moderation and Political Dynamics
Partisanship influences content moderation preferences. A study conducted via a conjoint survey experiment with 2,564 U.S. respondents revealed that while most citizens favor quashing harmful misinformation over protecting free speech, Republicans are generally less willing than Democrats or independents to remove posts or suspend accounts. Automated content moderation, however, presents issues like false positives and negatives, complicating this balance further.
Amid these differing perspectives, there is a recognized need for transparent and consistent content moderation policies that adequately consider public preferences and protect free speech. This contentious debate illustrates the complexity of balancing freedom of expression with the responsibility to prevent harm from misinformation.
