BP Scales Back on Wind Energy to Refocus on Oil, Gas, and Solar

British oil giant BP has decided to pull back on its wind energy ventures, signaling a major shift in its energy strategy. In a move announced in September 2024, the company revealed plans to divest its U.S. onshore wind business, which includes 10 wind farms spread across seven states. These wind assets, capable of generating 1.7 gigawatts of power, are no longer aligned with BP’s future growth plans, especially as the company refocuses on its core oil and gas operations.

BP's renewed emphasis on oil and gas follows increased pressure from investors concerned about the profitability of the company's aggressive renewable energy push. Murray Auchincloss, who took over as BP’s CEO, has emphasized the need to prioritize high-return investments, particularly in fossil fuel sectors such as U.S. shale and the Gulf of Mexico, areas BP believes offer more immediate financial returns compared to wind energy.

This shift represents a notable change from the strategy promoted by BP’s former CEO Bernard Looney, who had steered the company toward aggressive renewable investments, including onshore and offshore wind projects. However, rising costs, supply chain disruptions, and inflation have hit the wind industry hard. Many energy companies, including BP, have found that the financial returns from wind energy fall short of initial expectations. For instance, several offshore wind projects in the U.S. have faced delays or been renegotiated due to these economic hurdles​.

Another significant part of BP’s renewed strategy involves solar energy. The company is taking full ownership of Lightsource BP, a joint venture that has developed a strong presence in the global solar market. BP aims to use this acquisition to scale up its solar initiatives, which are seen as more viable for immediate profits while helping customers reduce their carbon footprints​.

This realignment away from wind energy comes at a time when many European oil companies are grappling with the balance between renewable investments and traditional fossil fuels. BP’s decision highlights the growing tension between investor demands for short-term profits and long-term sustainability goals. Although the company continues to promote biofuels and other low-carbon alternatives, wind energy has become a casualty of BP’s strategic recalibration​.

Auchincloss has argued that the company must remain financially strong to support its broader energy transition efforts. BP has committed to cutting oil and gas production by 25% by 2030 but will continue to rely on fossil fuels for a significant portion of its revenue. This pivot also reflects broader industry trends, as competitors like Shell and TotalEnergies face similar challenges in balancing renewable energy investments with the high returns offered by oil and gas).

Critics of BP's shift argue that pulling back from wind energy sends the wrong message about the company's commitment to combating climate change. Environmental groups have voiced concerns that BP is prioritizing profits over progress, potentially slowing the global transition to cleaner energy sources. On the other hand, BP maintains that its strategy still includes substantial investments in green energy, such as solar, and that the company is better positioned to drive the energy transition by maintaining a stable financial base through oil and gas​.

The broader context of BP's strategy shift is the current instability in global energy markets, exacerbated by the war in Ukraine and fluctuating oil prices. These factors have made it more difficult for energy companies to fully embrace renewable technologies without risking financial instability. BP's decision reflects a growing recognition in the industry that oil and gas will continue to play a crucial role, even as the world pushes toward a lower-carbon future.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR